Kentavious Caldwell-Pope to miss 3 road games as part of plea deal

EL SEGUNDO, Calif. — Kentavious Caldwell-Pope said he will not be able to play in three Los Angeles Lakers‘ road games outside the state of California in the next few weeks due to a modified 25-day restriction stemming from a plea agreement he reached on a misdemeanor offense while a player for the Detroit Pistons.

If the Lakers guard complies with this new restriction, he is slated to miss the Lakers’ games at Houston on Dec. 20, at Houston again on Dec. 31 and at Minnesota on Jan. 1. The only other Lakers’ road game during the 25-day restriction — which was given to Caldwell-Pope following a court appearance in Michigan this past week — is at Golden State on Dec. 22. Caldwell-Pope will be able to play in that game since he will not be leaving the state.

Caldwell-Pope already has missed one road game due to the restrictionand was not with the team for the Lakers’ 121-112 loss at Cleveland on Thursday.

“With the court situation, we came up with the agreement that I still get to carry on with my season but only in the state of California for the 25-day restriction that I have,” Caldwell-Pope said after practice on Saturday. “I was blessed that I am able to continue to play ball.”

Caldwell-Pope was originally cited for operating a vehicle while intoxicated but pleaded guilty in May to the lesser charge of allowing someone to operate his vehicle while under the influence, which carried a 12-month probation. Caldwell-Pope left the Lakers following a game in New York last Tuesday to Michigan, where he learned he had to return to California and miss Thursday’s game in Cleveland to start an intensive program over the next 25 days with the intention of ending his probation early.

“It helps,” Caldwell-Pope said of 25-day restriction allowing him to continue to play basketball. “With the court situation, we came up with the agreement that I still get to carry on with my season but only in the state of California for the 25-day restriction that I have. I was blessed that I am able to continue to play ball.”

“It was always a possibility that I would continue to play,” the guard added. “I just had agreed to some restrictions in order for me to continue to play.”

“As a result of his professional basketball work schedule, the court has modified the sentence and released him from probation early so long as he completes an intensive program over the next 25 days. There will be some travel restrictions, but we are pleased that Kentavious will now continue with his NBA season and move forward in a positive manner from this experience.”

Caldwell-Pope, who signed a one-year, $18-million contract with the Lakers as a free agent, is averaging 14.2 points, 4.9 rebounds and 1.8 steals while shooting 36.1% from 3-point range. The Lakers have leaned on Caldwell-Pope, 24, to provide veteran leadership, turn the Lakers’ defense around and at times be the team’s closer in close games.

“He is one of those guys that hits big shots for us and when you are on the road you can stall out a little bit like we have a tendency to do from time to time and he is somebody that can get it going and hit two or three straight jumpers or make a big play on defense or get a steal for us,” Lakers coach Luke Walton said. “There are things from both ends of the floor that we will miss from him. But it was nice having him back with us today in practice.”

On Saturday, the Lakers released a statement saying the team is “abiding by the terms of a program for Kentavious that were established for him by a court in the state of Michigan.”

Caldwell-Pope was suspended under the NBA’s personal conduct policy for the Lakers’ first two games of the season. The Lakers started rookie guard Josh Hart in place of Caldwell-Pope in Cleveland and Hart responded with a career-high 11 points and 10 rebounds in his first start.

“It has been very disappointing to me as well, as far as my teammates, I feel like I let them down as well, my coaches, the organization,” Caldwell-Pope said. “I just have to deal with this legal situation that came with it.”

Reports: Jahlil Okafor, Nik Stauskas traded to Brooklyn for Trevor Booker

JAHLIL OKAFOR THRILLED FOR A FRESH START WITH THE BROOKLYN NETS

NBA Agent Andy Miller relinquishes NBPA certification amid FBI probe

Adrian Wojnarowski | ESPN | 12/6/2018 11:24 AM CT
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/21690026/nba-agent-andy-miller-no-longer-represent-players-contract-negotiations

bmgzwngieaqo8kl

Andy Miller, one of the NBA’s most prominent player agents, has relinquished his National Basketball Players Association certification and will no longer represent players in contract negotiations, according to a union memo distributed on Wednesday.

Miller, who was representing dozens of NBA players including Kyle LowryKristaps Porzingis and Serge Ibaka, is considered to be part of the FBI’s probe into college basketball.

Miller is the president and founder of ASM Sports, and many of his former clients are expected to remain with other agents in the company, sources said. None of the company’s most prominent clients left in the wake of the FBI probe, which included the arrest of an ex-employee, Christian Dawkins, in September.

Miller, based in New Jersey, had represented several longtime All-Star players, including Chauncey Billups and Kevin Garnett.

Pitino sues University of Louisville Athletic Association

12487027-mmmainQuite frankly, I don’t understand how Rick Pitino can summon the gall to sue an institution that has supported him throughout all of his controversy at Louisville.  Although there is only one record of NCAA misconduct prior to his stint at with the Cardinals, it served as a foreshadow of the infamy to come.

In the 70’s, he served as both an assistant and interim head coach for the University of Hawaii.  While there, the program was hit by NCAA sanctions, with Pitino implicated in eight of the 64 violations.  The violations involving Pitino included giving plane tickets to a player, arranging for athletes to get used cars and giving out coupons for free food at McDonald’s.

Ironically, he would take the reigns of a troubled program at the University of Kentucky, which was facing NCAA sanctions prior to his arrival.

“This program is as rich in tradition as there is in all of basketball, but you’ve been brought to your knees with a tremendous scandal.” – Rick Pitino. 

He left Kentucky with a national championship, would go on to coach in the NBA, and then return to the college ranks at Louisville, where his third, and latest strike cost him his job and maybe his legacy.

Strike one: In 2009, he confessed that he had an affair with the wife of the team’s equipment manager and paid for her to have an abortion.  The woman, Karen Sypher, was later convicted of trying to extort Pitino for millions of dollars.  C’mon man.

Strike two: In 2015, Andre McGee, a former director of basketball operations was found to have provided strippers and prostitutes to players and recruits in a campus dormitory over several years.  The school declared itself ineligible for postseason play in 2016, and the NCAA suspended Pitino for the first five games of the coming season.

The scandal was heavily reported by ESPN’s “Outside the Lines” and YahooSports.  The allegations are detailed in a book entitled “Breaking Cardinal Rules: Basketball and the Escort Queen,” co-written by Katina Powell, who told ESPN she provided women for Louisville recruits in exchange for a total of $10,000 in payments.

Powell essentially served as a madam and in her book detailed about 21 recruiting “parties” with strippers and sex from 2010-2014 inside Billy Minardi Hall, an on-campus Louisville dorm for athletes and other students named for the late brother-in-law of Louisville coach Rick Pitino.  Powell gives an extensive interview with ESPN for its story and supplied information such as text messages and phone records.  One former Louisville recruit who is attending another school told ESPN:

I knew they weren’t college girls. It was crazy. It was like I was in a strip club.

Another player told ESPN that McGee…

would give us the money, just the recruits. A bunch of us were sitting there while they danced. Then the players left, and the recruits chose which one (of the dancers) they wanted.”

His lawyer, Scott Tompsett, planned an appeal of Pitino’s suspension because he said the ruling did not “identify a single specific thing that Coach Pitino should have done that he wasn’t already doing that would have either prevented or detected the illicit activities.”  Pitino has denied knowledge of the matter, to which Powell told ESPN, “How could he not know?”

Strike three: The latest scandal serves as the straw that broke the camel’s back.  In a federal complaint that I’ve previously posted, Louisville is alleged to have paid $100,000 to star recruit Brian Bowen.  That money was funneled from Adidas through Louisville in order to lure his commitment.  At the time he was recruited, Pitino told News Radio 840: “We got lucky on this one.  I had an A.A.U. director call me and ask me if I’d be interested in a player.  I said, ‘Yeah, I’d be really interested.’  In my 40 years of coaching, this is the luckiest I’ve been.”  Now, Bowen’s collegiate career, and Pitino’s coaching career are left in limbo.

Rick Pitino should use his absence from the basketball to re-evaluate his values, his purported lack of awareness, and what it means to be a leader.  He has been quick to point the finger of blame at everyone but himself.  In my opinion, even if he didn’t take part in either of the last two scandals, I attribute the consequences to blatant negligence.  How could this type of conduct continue under his nose?  Either he turned a blind eye to any instances of wrongdoing, or he elected to allow HIS team to be run behind closed doors by THEIR own devices, and not his.  That is not leadership.

ESPN reported the details of Pitino’s suit against his former employer, which made him the highest-paid coach in basketball at more than $7 million a year.

NBA personnel types mixed on what future holds for Michael Porter, Jr.

Microdiscectomy surgery may affect career path for Missouri’s talented forward

By: David Aldridge TNT Analyst | Nov 27, 2017 10:49 AM ET

 

Michael Porter, Jr. played just two minutes for Missouri before his season was shut down.  How is Michael Porter, Jr.’s Draft status impacted by his impending back surgery?

The Missouri freshman forward, a one-and-done lock, has generally been considered one of the top two incoming players in college basketball this season (along with Duke’s Marvin Bagley III). Both are at the top of most NBA teams’ current Draft boards.

But Porter played just two minutes for the Tigers this season before being shut down for good, with the team announcing last week that the 6-foot-10 forward would have a microdiscectomy — removing some of the bone over the nerve root and disc material under the nerve root, to alleviate pain — and miss the rest of the season. As this is almost certainly his only season in college, NBA teams will have to rely solely on what they saw of Porter in high school and the AAU circuit to make Draft evaluations, assuming Porter, as expected, declares for the 2018 Draft.

NBA front-office types still view Michael Porter, Jr. as a top-flight prospect.

Backs scare NBA types. They tend to linger throughout a player’s career; once Larry Bird’s back got jacked up, it didn’t get better, no matter what treatment he tried. The same with Tracy McGrady and others who played despite the pain, year after year. The microdiscectomy, of course, is supposed to alleviate some of that pain.

The uncertainty of how much Porter has been in, how much he’ll be in and how much he’ll be able to tolerate once he’s banging in the paint or getting knocked down on drives, taking charges, etc., is what NBA scouts and executives can only guess at right now.

I asked a dozen personnel people how concerned they were with Porter, Jr.’s surgery and if it will impact where he’s picked. The responses were mixed.

“If it’s a standard microdiscectomy, it shouldn’t be much of an issue (lots of those procedures on NBA players),” one general manager said Sunday via text. “If it’s more than that, the result could be of greater impact. If he can do a few draft workouts, he should be just fine. It may play out like the (Joel) Embiid draft where Joel was affected by a couple picks (because of the foot), but not much beyond that.”

But another executive had a different view.

“No doubt it hurts him,” the exec said. “Obviously the medical evaluation will be more important and often times as we know, the agents with players at this level withhold information from most of the teams so it will be an interesting decision as to how they handle. Backs are like knees and serious foot/ankle injuries. Tough ones.”

All will be watching to see how Porter, Jr.’s rehab program is structured for clues about how soon he’ll be back.

“It depends obviously on the outcome of the procedure and level of rehab success,” another GM said. “But it would take a real problematic situation to cause a big draft slip. He should stay well inside the Top 5.”

The top of the 2018 Draft looks potentially loaded, with Bagley, Arizona big man DeAndre Ayton and European wing Luka Doncic all expected to be taken high when and if they enter the Draft. No one I spoke with believes Porter, Jr, will fall out of the top five, though his position within the top five could slide a little.

“Every team in the top 5 in the lottery will do their medical due diligence and see the potential long-term impact,” another GM texted Sunday. “They will also compare his talent upside to the other top players in the draft. His lack of body of work could either hurt or help him based on how well Doncic, Bagley, and Ayton play throughout the year.”

If there are no complications and he makes a complete recovery, the surgery will not have any bearing on his draft position for me. But, I believe it will change how other people and ownership look at it.”

ANONYMOUS NBA PERSONNEL MAN, ON MICHAEL PORTER, JR.

Said another longtime personnel man: “he will still be a top five pick but might not go number 1 now. Almost like Embiid. If he were healthy, he would have been number 1 but with injury went 3. It depends where the gap is from top tier to next tier. If teams see 5 guys at the top he goes 5. If they see 3 guys he goes 3.”

And another: “it’ll be hard to take him #1, but unlikely he drops out of top 5 IMO.”

Another pro personnel man pointed out the injury will only make the input of higher-ups on a team even more acute.

“If there are no complications and he makes a complete recovery, the surgery will not have any bearing on his draft position for me,” the pro personnel man said. “But, I believe it will change how other people and ownership look at it.”

Porter posted a picture of an empty room on his Instagram feed Sunday, with a caption: “Just letting y’all know whoever said it was gonna take 3-4 months to recover lied” with two smiley faces afterward. (Porter neglected to inform that the original prognosis was delineated by Missouri, in its original Tweet about his impending surgery.)

Statement from :

Michael Porter, Jr. will undergo surgery on Tuesday, Nov. 21, in Dallas, Texas. The procedure, a microdiscectomy of the L3-L4 spinal discs, has a projected recovery time of three-four months and will likely cause him to miss the remainder of the season.

The immediate, fact-free speculation online Sunday night was that Porter was hinting at a possible return before the end of Missouri’s season. But no one knows for sure. That’s going to be a recurring theme when it comes to Porter and the NBA during the next seven months, before Draft night 2018.

“This will be like any other injury,” an assistant GM said. “You have to get as much information as possible and then determine if it is worth risk. However, back issues are generally more concerning than most. It’s gonna come down to information, information, & more information.”

http://www.nba.com/article/2017/11/27/morning-tip-future-missouri-michael-porter-jr-nba-executives-thoughts?collection=blogtable#/

 

Will a DraftExpress Lawsuit Change the World of Video Highlights?

1466800210

You might not be familiar with DeAndre Daniels. The Toronto Raptors selected him with the No. 37 pick in the 2014 NBA draft. Now 25 years old, the 6’9″ forward has yet to appear in an NBA regular–season game. He has played professionally in Australia and Italy and most recently played stateside for the G League Erie BayHawks.

The odds of you knowing about Daniels are certainly higher if you are a Raptors fan or a UConn fan—he played a key role in the Huskies winning a national title in 2014. And if you follow high school basketball and college recruiting, Daniels’s name is likely to ring a bell. He was a five-star recruit out of Taft High School in Woodlands, California, and also played post-graduate ball at the IMG Academy.

There’s another group of basketball fans who when they hear the name “DeAndre Daniels” think, “I remember that guy.”

That group would be NBA draft fanatics.

Back in 2014, those who love to consume all things NBA draft likely came across scouting reports and video analysis of Daniels. In doing so they probably encountered a DraftExpress.com profile centered on Daniels. The profile, which is accessible for free and doesn’t require any kind of registration, includes an 875-word scouting report co-authored by Jonathan Givony and Mike Schmitz. The profile assesses how well Daniels projects to play in the NBA. It also includes a 12-minute, 24-second video that blends a series of short highlights of Daniels playing at UConn with graphics discussing Daniels’s strengths and weaknesses.

The DraftExpress profile on Daniels is now the subject of a federal lawsuit. And it is a lawsuit that could impact how websites show video clips of athletes.

Getty Images Sport

 

Wazee Digital, a technology company that licenses video footage for the NCAA, has sued DraftExpress and its founder and owner, Givony, for copyright infringement. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York back in April, highlights the DraftExpress profile on Daniels to assert that DraftExpress has knowingly—and without Wazee’s consent—used video content that Wazee had registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Wazee stresses that it derives “a substantial revenue stream from licensing game footage to various entities and media outlets, who create game highlights or other video montages and rebroadcast those videos on television and on the Internet.” DraftExpress, Wazee reasons, ought to pay for this content as well.

Benefiting Wazee is that courts have held that copyright law protects sports broadcasts. This dynamic ensures that the NCAA, as well as professional sports leagues, can earn substantial revenue from licensing rights to broadcast games.

Yet copyright protection in a broadcast does not, by itself, prevent DraftExpress from legally using portions of the content. To that end, DraftExpress asserts that its use of copyrighted broadcasts is through “fair use.” Generally speaking, the legal doctrine of fair use permits copying of protected material for certain uses. When fair use applies, the copying party need not obtain permission or submit payment to the party in possession of the copyright.

Although fair use analysis is somewhat subjective, federal law and the U.S Supreme Court have identified five basic factors. None of these five factors are necessarily more influential than the other and they are usually balanced against each another.

The first factor is the purpose of the copying. When the intent is for news reporting and sharing of information, fair use is more likely to apply. However, copying motivated by pursuit of money is less likely to gain protection. On one hand, DraftExpress can convincingly argue that its content is newsworthy and informative. Profiles of draft-eligible players educate NBA draft fans, journalists and others about those players. Accompanying video analysis only further informs readers. DraftExpress can also stress that its website offers such content for free. On the other hand, DraftExpress, like most sports websites, profits from advertisements, including pre-roll advertisements that run before videos. DraftExpress has seemingly secured a sizable audience to watch those advertisements given that ESPN recently paid for the right to publish future DraftExpress content.

The second factor is the nature of the original work. In this instance, the original work consists of videos copyrighted by Wazee. The more creative the original work, the more protection it tends to gain. In contrast, the more factual the original work, the less protection applies. The underlying logic is that creative content ought to receive significant protection in order to properly incentivize inventiveness—if creative individuals knew that their work could be easily copied, they might become less likely to invest their time, energy and money into developing those works. Conversely, works derived from facts and events are less original and less deserving of protection. Video of a basketball game requires some degree of creativity since it reflects broadcast design choices as well as studio direction. At the same time, video of a basketball game is factual in nature: it depicts a live sporting event that is controlled by the athletes, coaches and referees—not the broadcasters.

The third factor is the extent and substantiality of copying. A person who engages in unauthorized copying is more likely to gain protection under fair use if the amount of copying is relatively minimal. DraftExpress stresses that its video of Daniels consists of only 66 seconds of copyrighted video from game broadcasts that are several hours long. The substantiality aspect of the copying refers whether the material copied is critical to the original work. It seems unlikely that short clips of Daniels performing various moves on the court would be considered the “heart” of any original broadcast.

Fourth is how the relevant copying impacts the marketplace. Wazee contends that DraftExpress has caused the company to lose licensing fees that it believes DraftExpress owes. If DraftExpress can use such video without paying, DraftExpress is arguably diluting the value of Wazee’s broadcast licenses. After all, such a practice could encourage other websites to copy Wazee’s broadcasts without permission or pay. On the other hand, DraftExpress can assert that the relatively small amount of copying of Daniels and other players does not impact Wazee’s ability to license broadcasts of the entire games. Stated differently, DraftExpress featuring video highlights arguably doesn’t implicate the marketplace of selling entire game broadcasts.

Finally, the fifth factor is whether the “derivative work” (i.e., DraftExpress scouting videos) is sufficiently transformative from the original work. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized so-called “transformative use.” The basic idea is that the derivative work uses the original work in such a distinct way that it becomes “transformed” into a different kind of work. DraftExpress’ legal filings suggest the company is confident it will prevail based on the transformative factor. In one filing, attorneys from DraftExpress’ law firm, Miller Barondess, detail how DraftExpress’ video of Daniels incorporates DraftExpress’s own original analysis and graphics:

[O]riginal graphics are followed by roughly 30-second-long clips, each illustrating one of Daniels’ strengths in actual gameplay situations. After assessing Daniels’ strengths, the Video Breakdown follows the same format to dissect and analyze his weaknesses (strengths begin at 28 seconds); (weaknesses begin at 6:01).

DraftExpress’ analysis of Daniels’ “Physical Tools” is illustrative. The “Physical Tools” segment begins 43 seconds into the video. An introductory graphic provides an overview of Daniels’ “Physical Tools,” which include “[e]xcellent size and length.”

Expect attorneys for Wazee, who have retained Adam Hirsch of Kutak Rock, to counter these points by insisting that graphic overlays and similar adjustments do not alter the underlying — and copyrighted — video of Daniels playing at UConn.

Like any lawsuit, Wazee v. DraftExpress could settle at any time. But if it proceeds toward a trial, its outcome would be important to anyone who posts highlight videos online and earns money by doing so. This is true for those who have monetized their YouTube accounts.

By: Michael McCann, November 27, 2017 | https://www.si.com/nba/2017/11/27/draftexpress-video-deandre-daniels-lawsuit-wazee-nba-draftLink to video conversation regarding the legal aspects at play here.

 

McCann, SI’s legal analyst, provides legal and business analysis for The Crossover. He is also the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at the University of New Hampshire School of Law and co-author with Ed O’Bannon of the forthcoming book Court Justice: The Inside Story of My Battle Against the NCAA.

76ers’ Jahlil Okafor remains hopeful for quick resolution

iI had the pleasure of watching this kid for two seasons as he excelled at Whitney Young High School here in Chicago.  Jahlil Okafor is a winner, a rare talent, and he has exhibited great patience as career in the NBA has stalled in the hands of Philadelphia 76ers front office. The recognitions speak for themselves.

  • Chicago Sun-Times Basketball Player of the Year as a junior.
  • Illinois Class 4A State Champion as a senior.
  • 2014 Mr. Illinois Basketball
  • McDonald’s High School All-American (Co-MVP)
  • Jordan Brand Classic All-American (Co-MVP)
  • 2015 ACC Player of the Year (Duke)
  • 2015 United States Basketball Writers Association Freshman of the Year
  • 2015 Consensus 1st Team All-American
  • 2015 NCAA Champion (Duke)
  • 2016 NBA All-Rookie 1st Team

This is all before dropping 20lbs and regaining full health after undergoing knee surgery at the end of the last NBA season.  His resilience has helped him overcome the passing of his mother and I really hope his determination never wavers.  The potential is undeniable.  Here is a web article featuring his story about overcoming tragedy and below is a new ESPN article by Adrian Wojnarowski regarding the conundrum in Philly. As a resident Chicagoan, avid Duke fan, and proponent for deserved opportunity, I am surely rooting for this kid and I believe his future is bright!

____________________________________________

Philadelphia 76ers center Jahlil Okafor‘s strange story drags on, but nothing changes. Sixers general manager Bryan Colangelo makes rounds upon rounds of futile trade calls. Out of respect, coach Brett Brown refuses to insert Okafor into the garbage minutes of blowouts.

Time passes and Okafor waits.

He isn’t a part of the franchise’s present, nor its future. He was the third overall pick in the 2015 NBA draft and a member of the first-team All-NBA Rookie team, but that’s disappeared into the distance. The Sixers are undergoing a franchise renaissance, armed with young superstars Joel Embiid and Ben Simmons.

As for Okafor, he has been cast aside, a casualty of a process that has moved on without him.

“I would like for them to just send me somewhere where I can get an opportunity,” Okafor told ESPN. “I’ve done everything they’ve asked of me and I would just like to get an opportunity to play with a trade or a buyout. I just hope something happens quickly.

“This is my third year in the NBA, and I know it’s a business. I don’t know if it’s fair or not, but in talking to other people in the NBA, talking to retired players, one thing I’ve heard them say is that what’s going on with me isn’t right and they’ve never seen anything like this before.

“I know it’s business, but in my eyes, I don’t know if it’s good business.”

There are legitimate reasons why Colangelo hasn’t found a trade for Okafor. A year ago, those centered on questions about Okafor’s durability and knee surgery to end the 2015-16 season. This season, Okafor returned 20 pounds lighter, fitter and far more deft on his feet.

Colangelo’s asking price has steadily dropped for Okafor, from two first-round picks to a first and a solid player to where it stands now, a second-round pick, league sources said. As for the politics of giving up on the No. 3 overall pick, remember: Colangelo didn’t select Okafor over Kristaps Porzingis in the 2015 draft — his predecessor, Sam Hinkie, did.

“We appreciate the effort that [Okafor] has put forth, and other than a little frustration expressed recently, he’s been patient waiting for an opportunity to play,” Colangelo told ESPN. “I continue to explore opportunities with both Jahlil and [agent] Bill Duffy to find a more suitable spot for him.”

Colangelo resisted any trade proposal that cut into the Sixers’ $15.1 million in salary-cap space prior to Nov. 15, because he planned to use that as part of his contract extension and renegotiation offer to forward Robert Covington. That limited the Sixers to trades that would bring back only the equivalent of Okafor’s $5 million salary, or less.

Once Covington agreed to his deal, the declining of Okafor’s $6.2 million fourth-year contract option for the 2018-19 season further compromised the Sixers’ ability to trade him.

Louisville not reinstating freshman Brian Bowen at center of FBI investigation

Bowen will remain on scholarship and is free to transfer, the school announced.

Photo by David Banks/Getty Images

Brian Bowen will not play for Louisville basketball this season, the school has announced. Bowen is the five-star freshman widely believed to be involved in the FBI’s investigation into corruption in college basketball.

The FBI alleged that Louisville agreed to pay “Player-10” $100,000 through Adidas for his commitment to the school. Bowen was suspended indefinitely following details of the report, and has since been cleared by the FBI. Louisville reportedly chose not to reinstate him.

While Bowen will not play for Louisville this season, the school announced he will remain on scholarship and is free to transfer.

Here’s the official statement from the school:

Brian Bowen will not play at the University of Louisville. He may remain on scholarship but will not be allowed to practice or compete

There has been major fallout at Louisville since the FBI investigation became public. Head coach Rick Pitino was fired, as was AD Tom Jurich.  Bowen’s commitment to Louisville in early June came as a major surprise throughout college basketball. The McDonald’s All-American was thought to be choosing between Michigan State and Texas before his camp reportedly reached out to Louisville at the last minute to set up an official visit.

Here’s what Pitino said after Bowen pledged:

“We got lucky on this one,” Pitino told Terry Meiners of News Radio 840. “I had an AAU director call me and ask me if I’d be interested in a player (Bowen). I saw him against another great player from Indiana. I said ‘Yeah, I’d be really interested.’ They had to come in unofficially, pay for their hotel, pay for their meals. We spent zero dollars recruiting a five-star athlete who I loved when I saw him play. In my 40 years of coaching this is the luckiest I’ve been.”

Former assistant David Padgett was named interim coach, and has guided the Cardinals to 4-0 start. Louisville has games coming up against ranked teams in Purdue and Seton Hall later this month.

“Brian has been a responsible young man for the institution since he enrolled,” interim Louisville athletics director Vince Tyra said in a statement. “He has endeared himself to his teammates and the men’s basketball staff with a positive attitude during a very difficult period.”

Chuck Person, Rashan Michel Indicted After FBI Probe of NCAA Basketball Scandal

NOVEMBER 7, 2017NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 10: Chuck Person exits the Federal Courthouse in Manhattan on October 10, 2017 in New York City. Several people associated with NCAA Basketball have been charged as part of a corruption ring. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

Suspended Auburn Tigers assistant coach Chuck Person and Rashan Michel have been indicted after they were arrested in September as part of the FBI’s investigation into corruption and bribery in college basketball.

ESPN.com’s Jeff Goodman relayed word from Department of Justice spokesman Nicholas Baise on Tuesday confirming the two had been indicted. Citing a source, Goodman added indictments for the eight other individuals arrested as part of the probe are forthcoming.

Yahoo Sports’ Dan Wetzel first reported Nov. 3 that all 10 men arrested as part of the investigation would be indicted this week.

According to Wetzel, “the charges are but a formality but would negate the need for a Nov. 9 preliminary hearing in New York scheduled last month by Judge Katherine Parker.”

Person—who has been suspended indefinitely without pay by Auburn—was charged with six federal crimes following a three-year investigation by the FBI.

According to the Montgomery Advertiser‘s Matthew Stevens, Person allegedly “received $91,500 in bribery payments in a scheme to steer two unnamed Auburn players to certain agents and financial advisers,” while Michel “agreed to accept approximately $50,000 in bribe payments from an undercover federal agent.”

Since leaving his post as an NBA referee, Michel has become well-known for his custom clothing company that often works with professional athletes.

The other men named in the FBI’s investigation are Oklahoma State assistant Lamont Evans, Arizona assistant Emanuel Richardson, USC assistant Tony Bland, Adidas executives Merl Code and James Gatto, financial adviser Munish Sood, AAU coach Jonathan Brad Augustine and athlete adviser Christian Dawkins.

By: ALEC NATHAN 

_____________________________________________________________

Here are a summary of the indictments which were announced by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York on September 26.

*                *                *

Defendant Age Hometown Charges (Potential Maximum Term of Imprisonment)
Chuck Connors Person

 

53 Auburn, AL Bribery conspiracy, Solicitation of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud, Wire fraud conspiracy; Travel Act conspiracy (80 years)

 

Rashan Michel

 

43 Smyrna, GA Bribery conspiracy, Solicitation of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud,

Wire fraud conspiracy; Travel Act conspiracy (80 years)

 

Lamont Evans

 

40 Stillwater, OK Bribery conspiracy, Solicitation of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud,

Conspiracy to commit wire fraud; Travel Act conspiracy (80 years)

Emanuel Richardson, a/k/a “Book” 44 Tucson, AZ Bribery conspiracy, Solicitation of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud,

Conspiracy to commit wire fraud; Travel Act conspiracy (80 years)

Anthony Bland, a/k/a “Tony” 37 Los Angeles, CA Bribery conspiracy, Solicitation of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud,

Conspiracy to commit wire fraud; Travel Act conspiracy (80 years)

Christian Dawkins 24 Atlanta, GA Bribery conspiracy, Payments of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud (3 counts), Wire fraud conspiracy (2 counts), Wire fraud (2 counts), Travel Act conspiracy, Money laundering conspiracy (200 years)
Munish Sood 45 Trenton, NJ Bribery conspiracy, Payments of bribes, Honest services fraud conspiracy, Honest services fraud (3 counts), Wire fraud conspiracy (2 counts), Wire fraud (2 counts), Travel Act conspiracy, Money laundering conspiracy (200 years)
James Gatto, a/k/a “Jim” 47 Wilsonville, OR Wire fraud conspiracy, Wire fraud (2 counts), Money laundering conspiracy (80 years)
Merl Code 43 Greer, SC Wire fraud conspiracy, Wire fraud (2 counts), Money laundering conspiracy (80 years)
Jonathan Brad Augustine 32 Winter Garden, FL Wire fraud conspiracy, Wire fraud (2 counts), Money laundering conspiracy (80 years)

Quiaodan aka “Chinese Jordan” files suit against Jordan Brand for damaging its reputation after Jordan Brand won initial case in Chinese courts

“Chinese Jordan sued U.S. Jordan infringement! Claim 1 million 100 thousand yuan!”

0GsJzYPO2P

Beijing on July 19th news, between China Jordan sports company and U.S. basketball star Michael Jordan is the United States after renewed strife, Jordan sued Chinese Jordan, and recently, China Jordan will Jordan taken to court, claims 1 million 100 thousand yuan.

Event background:

China Jordan sports company is the Thirteenth National Official partners, a letter of attorney and U.S. basketball star Michael Jordan authorized lawyers issued to the Tianjin Municipal Sports Bureau and the National Committee of the China Jordan company that the lawyer’s letter. The famous reputation infringement, so Michael Jordan and his authorized court lawyer claims.

Beijing court network published the case that:

Michael Geoffrey Jordan (Jordan) authorized Shanghai Fangda (Beijing) law firm (hereinafter referred to as Beijing Fonda) to the Tianjin Municipal Sports Bureau, the Thirteenth National Games Organizing Committee issued a lawyer’s letter, recently, Jordan sports Limited by Share Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the Jordan sports company) and Jordan renewed strife. Because of that letter structure reputation infringement, Jordan sports company Jordan, Fonda Beijing to court to stop infringement, apology, rehabilitation, and claim the spirit of solatium, 1 million 100 thousand yuan rights fee.

Jordan sports company complained: “our company was established in 2000, and has been operating for nearly 17 years. After more than 10 years of development, it has become a well-known sports brand enterprise in china. The main use of the company’s “Jordan” brand and products, has been identified as the national “well-known trademark”, “Chinese brand”, “national Mianjian products”, our company for many years to obtain national and provincial honors, was awarded the “2013 national market sales of similar products in the top four, similar products for the year 2014 comprehensive market share of top five” hundred awards.

In addition, I also actively support the construction and development of sports events, to become partners, sponsoring sports equipment support for a number of national and provincial and municipal sports team, a positive commitment to social responsibility, the cumulative donations of more than two hundred million yuan, enjoy a high reputation, and establish a good social image.

Our company registered and used Jordan, QIAODAN and related graphics trademarks, of which the main use of the “Jordan” trademark was identified as “well-known trademarks” and “Fujian province” well-known brands”.

In June 1991, Jordan authorized Nike innovation limited partnership to apply for the registration of “MICHAEL JORDAN” and related graphics trademarks. However, Jordan has interfered with our company’s operation, and brought 78 malicious lawsuits against our registered trademark, which has led to serious economic losses and adverse effects on our company.

In February 9, 2017, Jordan authorized Beijing Fonda to the Tianjin Sports Bureau and the Thirteenth National Games Organizing Committee market development department issued a lawyer’s letter. Jordan sports company believes that the lawyer’s letter to the objective facts and judgment error description and summary, misleading court judgments for malicious content, the company made disparaging comments or even malicious slander, in an attempt to make the Tianjin Municipal Sports Bureau and the National Games Organizing Committee to terminate the cooperation between the two sides; the lack of professional Beijing Fonda and rigorous, misleading, damage the company’s reputation confuse right and wrong.

Jordan sports company said, Jordan has filed 78 cases of trademark disputes administrative disputes, as of the date of the letter issued by the lawyer, only 3 cases, the judge, the jury re decision, and the remaining cases Jordan lost. But the lawyer’s letter deliberately misled others into thinking that our company’s trademark had been completely revoked.

In these cases, there are 57 cases have been ruling the Supreme People’s court for retrial, to maintain the high court of Beijing decision, Jordan dismissed the application for retrial, these cases involve the trademark system I use the Jordan characters, Pinyin and graphic trademarks, including the use of the trademark in the national games. The ruling confirmed my company registered trademark “Jordan” and the elements do not exist on the negative, the negative impact of the social public interests and public order, do not belong to disturb the trademark registration order or damage the public interests, illegal occupation of public resources or otherwise seek illegitimate interests; Jordan does not enjoy the name right on the graphics and “QIAODAN”.

In addition, there are 10 cases by the Beijing High Court of second instance, has rejected Jordan’s appeal and upheld the original verdict; 8 cases are in the trial, but the second instance is the high court of Beijing Jordan dismissed the appeal and upheld; the other 3 cases the Supreme Court ruling only judges to make a new ruling, three trademarks and relates to only my company registered “defensive trademark”, does not use in the management of trademarks, will not be used in the games.

Jordan Fonda Beijing issued by the authorized lawyer’s letter did not explain the overall situation of litigation, the bad judgment to conceal the Supreme Court, the high court to Beijing, causing people mistakenly think that all of our trademarks are convicted of revocation, related to trademark use will lead to suffer adverse effects in the games the National Games, the lawyer’s letter misinterpreted the contents of the judgment of the Supreme Court, which seriously misleading, has obvious subjective malice. For example, Jordan sports company said in the indictment, the lawyer’s letter will trademark administrative dispute called trademark revocation case, the judges will be required to make a new ruling verdict that is due to the registered trademark name right infringement shall be revoked. Jordan sports company believes that the above statements one concept, third party, have lost seriously misleading the professional legal services should be in violation of the provisions of the “and rigorous, the Beijing Lawyers Association standard practice guidelines” No. sixth, severely damaged the reputation of the company, the company legal failure and third parties, against the legitimate rights and interests.

To sum up, Jordan sports company believes that the existence of a large number of letters inconsistent with the facts, does not comply with the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court judges will referee one concept, deliberate misinterpretation, misleading for the judgment of the court, and many of the company’s disparaging evaluations and even malicious slander, damage the company’s reputation. The lawyer’s letter is issued, the third party has the relevant matters concerned, inquiry, leading to social evaluation of the company decreased, suffered huge losses, it is taken to court, asked Jordan, Fonda Beijing to immediately stop the infringement, withdraw the lawyer’s letter, a public apology, restore reputation, eliminate the influence, and compensation for mental solatium 1 million yuan and 100 thousand yuan rights fee.

It is reported that Beijing Chaoyang Court has formally accepted the case. At present, the case is under further investigation.

http://www.bestchinanews.com/Sports/16106.html,  2017-07-20 00:53:28